Frequently Asked Questions: Where do I start?
Back to the overview of all questions.
Where Do I Start?
With the Logic — if you place a commentary alongside it.
The usual advice runs otherwise: not with the Logic, it is said to be too difficult. That held true as long as one read it unaccompanied. Anyone who starts alone with “being, nothing, becoming” finds determinations without intuition and gives up after twenty pages.
With accompaniment it is different. The commentary on the Logic guides you through the course of the matter in eighteen chapters — not as a retelling, but by showing at every point why the next step follows. Anyone who reads it alongside the Encyclopedia gets through.
The reason it is worth it: the Logic is not one part of the system among others, but the determinations with which all the rest is thought. Whoever has it understands the Philosophy of Right in half the time.
Next: Commentary on the Logic · Glossary · The Logic
And what if I want to make it easier for myself?
Then there are two paths, both legitimate.
One leads by way of a subject matter: the Philosophy of Right deals with property, contract, punishment, family, state — things everyone already has an opinion about, and that helps. The commentary on it makes the logical order visible without presupposing the logic.
The other leads by way of a propaedeutic: first learn to think, then read Hegel. For this there are two books by Kai Froeb — Systematisches Denken and Was ist Wahrheit? — which drill the movements of thought that matter in Hegel, using examples from science and everyday life.
The easiest path: the lectures. Anyone who wants to take it easy does not start with the major works, but with what Hegel spoke — the lectures on aesthetics, on history, on religion, on the history of philosophy. They were made for listeners, not for readers, and it shows: Hegel narrates, compares, and becomes explicit where the textbook stays terse.
In a letter, Engels recommended the aesthetics lectures for relaxation, as reading for one’s leisure. This is not meant ironically. Anyone who wants to know how Hegel thinks before engaging with what he thinks will find the most comfortable access there. It is best to start with the introductions: they give the overview that the major works presuppose.
A word of advice on secondary literature. Read Hegel himself first. A large part of what has been written about him creates more problems than it solves — and whoever knows the text can judge what the interpretations are worth. This applies to these pages as well.
Which Edition?
To start with, the Suhrkamp works edition in twenty volumes: accessible, affordable, with the lecture additions. It is based on the Association of Friends edition of 1832–1845 and is textually outdated, but it serves well enough for reading.
Those working more precisely need the Collected Works of the North Rhine-Westphalian Academy — the historical-critical edition. It is expensive and not yet complete.
Free and complete. All volumes of the Association of Friends edition are available at hegel.net/hegelwerke as scans of the original volumes, along with the first editions. For looking up a passage, this is unbeatable. For reading, less so: scans cannot be searched, cannot be reflowed, and fit no e-reader.
The lectures are now available in individual editions, arranged according to the transcripts of particular years rather than merged into a single text. This is a considerable difference: the Association of Friends edition blended various years together, which renders developments invisible.
For the Logic, too, such editions exist, and few people know this: volumes 10 and 11 of the Ausgewählte Nachschriften [Selected Transcripts] from Meiner — Berlin 1831 and Heidelberg 1817 — plus volume 23 of the Gesammelte Werke [Collected Works] in three parts, edited by Annette Sell, containing all the transcripts from 1801/02 to 1831.
Next: Editions · Texts online · PDFs
How Long Does It Take?
For a first pass through the Encyclopedia with commentary, a few months, if one reads regularly.
That sounds like a lot, and it is. Hegel cannot be skimmed — his sentences presuppose what was developed twenty pages earlier, and whoever skips that reads words instead of thoughts.
But the reverse also holds: what has once been understood, stays understood. The determinations recur throughout every part of the system.
I’ve given up before. What do I do differently this time?
Three things help, as experience shows.
Don’t read alone. This is the most common reason for giving up — not lack of talent, but lack of guidance. A commentary that tells you at every point what is happening turns the same text into a different experience.
Bring along an object. Hegel’s determinations are abstract, but they are won from something. Anyone who keeps an example in mind while reading — an institution, a dispute, an experience — grasps what is being talked about more quickly.
Don’t mistake the language for intention. Hegel writes difficult prose, but not in order to impress. Much of what sounds obscure is the technical vocabulary of his time; other passages are attempts to capture in one sentence a movement that would really need three.
Next: Glossary — it explains the terms that readers most often get stuck on
Do I Need Kant First?
It helps a great deal, but it is not required.
Hegel presupposes Kant, and not merely as a predecessor, but as the one whose question he carries forward. Whoever knows what Kant means by thing-in-itself, antinomy, and synthetic judgment a priori will understand Hegel’s objections.
Whoever does not know this can still get through — the Encyclopedia references Kant at the necessary points. It simply remains unclear why a given determination is introduced this way and not another.
Continue: Kant in the System · Modern Philosophy
Which Secondary Literature Actually Helps?
For this there is a dedicated, annotated Bibliography on Hegel’s Logic — compiled after decades of reading, with notes on what each book is good for and what it is not.
A warning in advance, stated more fully there: there are two ways to study Hegel. From outside — one reads what X says about Hegel, compares Y with Z, collects interpretations. And from inside — one retraces the movement oneself. The first leads to knowing the literature and not the subject matter.
The commentaries of Hegel’s students. Little known and underrated: Hegel’s immediate students wrote commentaries on the Logic that go through the text paragraph by paragraph — they had heard it in his lectures and knew what was meant.
Anyone who wants to choose one should take Johann Eduard Erdmann’s Grundriß der Logik und Metaphysik, third edition: shorter and more precise than the others, with all the improvements of the first two editions and still close enough to the original. The fourth edition already shows some distance and is colored by the later spirit of the age.
Alongside it stand Karl Werder’s Logik (1841) and Hermann Hinrichs’s Grundlinien (1826), along with the accounts by Karl Rosenkranz and Carl Ludwig Michelet. All of these are available on hegel.net, each author under his own name, and are individually linked in our examination of Henrich’s interpretation of the Logic.
What should be avoided: accounts that dispatch Hegel in a single chapter. What usually comes out of these is the thesis-antithesis formula and the claim about the world spirit.
Continue: Bibliography · Persons · History of Reception
Back to the overview of all questions · onward to Logic