Frequently Asked Questions: Hegel's Philosophy of Spirit
Back to the overview of all questions.
What Does Hegel Mean by “Spirit” (Geist)?
Nothing ghostly, and nothing merely inward.
For Hegel, spirit is everything that human beings bring forth together and that acts back upon them: language, law, custom, art, religion, science. It does not reside in one head but between heads — and it persists when individuals die.
The English word mind therefore captures only half of it; spirit sounds too religious. What comes closest is perhaps what we today call culture — not in the sense of customs, but in the sense of the forms through which human beings determine themselves.
Further: Geist in the glossary · Absolute Spirit · Spirit
What Does Recognition Mean?
That I come to myself only through others.
A person does not know from within who he is. He learns it from how others treat him — and the others likewise from him. Self-consciousness is therefore not a relation to oneself alone, but one that runs through others.
The famous passage on lord and bondsman demonstrates this through a mismatch: whoever subjugates the other receives recognition from someone whose recognition counts for nothing — and comes away empty-handed. The bondsman, by contrast, forms himself through labor and gains what the lord loses.
Further: Anerkennung in the glossary · Phenomenology, Chapter IV · Honneth’s Theory of Recognition
What Is the Difference between Moralität and Sittlichkeit?
Moralität is what I hold to be right. Sittlichkeit is what holds good.
Kant’s moral philosophy asks what I can will without contradicting myself — it examines intention. Hegel considers this necessary and yet too little: a disposition that is realized nowhere remains empty, and whoever follows only his own conscience has no criterion beyond himself.
Sittlichkeit is the shape that the good has taken on in institutions: family, civil society, the state. There, what is right is not merely intended but instituted — and therefore also open to critique.
Further: Sittlichkeit in the glossary · Commentary on the Philosophy of Right · Moralität
Does Hegel Deify the State?
The sentence on which this accusation rests appears in the Philosophy of Right and reads differently from how it is usually quoted.
Hegel writes that the state is “the march of God through the world.” He does not mean this or that particular state, but the state as the realization of freedom — and the sentence occurs in an addition, that is, in a student’s transcript of the lectures, not in the main text.
At the same time, it is true that Hegel considers the state higher than the individual, because it is what first makes freedom possible. Whoever finds this dangerous is not wrong — the question is whether the alternative offers a sturdier foundation.
Continue: The State · Commentary on the Philosophy of Right
What Is the “End of History”?
A formula Hegel himself never used.
It originates with Alexandre Kojève, who lectured on the Phenomenology in Paris during the 1930s, and was popularized by Francis Fukuyama. In Hegel, world history is said to be progress in the consciousness of freedom — which is something other than its end.
What holds true: Hegel considers the principle of freedom to have been found. What he does not claim: that it has been realized everywhere, or that nothing further will happen.
Next: Kojève and the French Explosion · World History
Why do art, religion, and philosophy stand at the very top?
Because they have the same object, in three forms.
According to Hegel, all three deal with the Absolute — with that which is no longer conditioned by anything else. Art shows it sensuously, religion represents it, philosophy comprehends it. The order follows the form, not the value: philosophy is not better than art, but rather the form in which both know themselves explicitly.
The fact that Hegel places philosophy last has earned him the charge of self-glorification. The objection is old and not yet settled.
Continue: Absolute Spirit · Absolut in the glossary
Did Hegel Claim the End of Art?
He said that art, “on the side of its highest vocation, is for us a thing of the past” — and that is something different.
What is meant is this: art is no longer the form in which a society negotiates its highest questions. In ancient Athens, tragedy was that form; in modernity, it is science and philosophy. Art continues to be made and continues to matter — only no longer as the organ of truth.
Whether this is true is an open question. Twentieth-century art, in any case, often understood itself explicitly as a form of knowledge.
Back to overview of all questions · continue to After Hegel